Stephan's insurance company denied his recent claim, citing that his particular cause of loss was not covered. However, according to Stephan's interpretation of the policy language, his loss could be covered, so he disputed the insurer's decision. When his case went to trial, the jury also decided the policy language was open to interpretation, so they decided in favor of Stephan. This is because:

Stephan's insurance company denied his recent claim, citing that his particular cause of loss was not covered. However, according to Stephan's interpretation of the policy language, his loss could be covered, so he disputed the insurer's decision. When his case went to trial, the jury also decided the policy language was open to interpretation, so they decided in favor of Stephan. This is because:



Answer: insurance policies are contracts of adhesion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident. Which of the following coverages would NOT pay for your injuries?

You are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident. Which of the following coverages would NOT pay for your injuries? Answer: Sarah's Collision coverage In the scenario described, if you are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident, the coverage that would typically not pay for your injuries would be "Medical Payments Coverage" (MedPay) or "Personal Injury Protection" (PIP), depending on the specific insurance policy and jurisdiction. Here's a breakdown of the relevant coverages and why they may or may not apply: Liability Coverage : This coverage pays for injuries and property damage you cause to others in an accident where you are at fault. Since Sarah is at fault in this scenario, her liability coverage would typically cover injuries to other parties involved in the accident, including you as a passenger in her car. However, it would not cover your injuries. Medical Payments Coverage (MedPay) :
Read more