A Second to Die policy would be the most appropriate recommendation for which of the following?

A Second to Die policy would be the most appropriate recommendation for which of the following?



a. A husband and wife concerned about paying estate taxes after they have died

b. A business owner who wants to make sure his wife has enough money to buy the business from his partner if he should die before his partner does

c. A corporation concerned that its CEO might die before the end of his employment contract

d. Two business partners who are concerned about the future success of the business and want to provide funds to purchase the business from the decedent's family



Answer: A

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident. Which of the following coverages would NOT pay for your injuries?

You are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident. Which of the following coverages would NOT pay for your injuries? Answer: Sarah's Collision coverage In the scenario described, if you are riding in Sarah's car when she fails to yield and causes an accident, the coverage that would typically not pay for your injuries would be "Medical Payments Coverage" (MedPay) or "Personal Injury Protection" (PIP), depending on the specific insurance policy and jurisdiction. Here's a breakdown of the relevant coverages and why they may or may not apply: Liability Coverage : This coverage pays for injuries and property damage you cause to others in an accident where you are at fault. Since Sarah is at fault in this scenario, her liability coverage would typically cover injuries to other parties involved in the accident, including you as a passenger in her car. However, it would not cover your injuries. Medical Payments Coverage (MedPay) :
Read more